Wednesday, August 31, 2005

What a Week for Bad News

We watched the news last night regarding the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. FEMA is saying that this is the greatest natural disaster in modern US history, and it is pretty hard to argue that point, especially when they start talking about the death toll in these terms:

In a surprising assessment of Hurricane Katrina’s lethal destruction, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin said Wednesday he feared that thousands had died in his city alone and that the entire city would have to be evacuated.

“We know there is a significant number of dead bodies in the water,” Nagin told reporters, adding that there are others dead in attics.

Too bad that a good chunk of our National Guard is bogged down in Iraq. Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, and Florida could sure use the help right now.

Iraq isn't doing all that well either:

In the highest one-day toll since the American invasion, more than 800 people died this morning after rumors of a suicide bomber led to a stampede in a vast procession of Shiite pilgrims as they crossed a bridge on their way to a shrine in northern Baghdad.

Gas to Top $4.00 a Gallon?

This is interesting:

Consumers can expect retail gas prices to rise to $4 a gallon soon but whether they stay there depends on the long-term damage to oil facilities from Hurricane Katrina, oil and gas analysts said Wednesday.

"There's no question gas will hit $4 a gallon," Ben Brockwell, director of pricing at the Oil Price Information Service, said. "The question is how high will it go and how long will it last?"

I've never had a real problem with Americans having to pay more at the pump. After all, expensive gas would certainly aid in the development of alternative fuel vehicles and add to the push for higher-mileage gas-powered vehicles. But a sudden jump to $4.00 a gallon could cripple the U.S. economy, particularly if the price stayed up there for a while.

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Some Random Thoughts on Intelligent Design

A member of the radical religious right said something on talk radio the other night that caught my attention. This person actually admitted that global warming is real. He explained it like this: Due to the increase in "liberal" influence these past few decades, the folks who go to Hell nowadays burn much hotter than the average hell-bound soul did just 50 years ago. What that means of course is that the center of the Earth -- the place where Hell is located -- is much warmer than it used to be due to all this extra fuel for the hell fires; and a lot of this additional heat escapes from the Earth's core and causes the planet's overall temperature to rise.

Although I laughed pretty hard as this very funny gentleman was explaining his theory (to his credit, he did indirectly admit that the Earth is round), his words were troubling. Could this be the direction in which science in America is heading?

As noted here, the Kansas Board of Education recently approved the teaching of "intelligent design" in Kansas classrooms. Now, I went to a Catholic grade school and a Catholic high school, so I don't have any personal experience to fall back on -- but I do remember friends of mine from the public schools taking religion classes in high school. I think they were courses that covered and compared the belief systems of many different religions.

Are such classes still taught in public schools, and if so, why can't the radical right's intelligent design concept be taught in classes like that? Why are the religious extremists demanding that a matter of faith be taught in science classes? They don't even like science.

At first I assumed that the religious right wants intelligent design taught in science classes and not in comparative religion classes because they do not want their beliefs about creation held up next to the belief systems of other "inferior" religions. But there appears to be a lot more to it than that.

Clearly, the radical religious right's hatred of science is behind all of this. And don't think this attack is limited merely to the push for intelligent design. Science has recently come under attack in the areas of stem cell research, climate change, and controlling the spread of AIDS. Even our National Park system is in the sights of America's radical fundamental extremists:
In a series of recent decisions, the National Park Service has approved the display of religious symbols and Bible verses, as well as the sale of creationist books giving a non-evolutionary explanation for the Grand Canyon and other natural wonders within national parks, according to documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

This anti-science crusade is particularly troubling from a national security standpoint. The United States has one of the highest high school dropout rates in the industrialized world. China, meanwhile, graduates twice as many students with bachelor degrees as does the U.S., and has six times as many graduates majoring in engineering.

In other words, this dumbing down of America couldn't be happening at a worse time. Last year, the Pentagon admitted that global warming is one of the great security threats facing this country in the years ahead. The time has come for America's radical religious extremists to be viewed in the same way.

UPDATE: Martin referred me to this site. Finally, a theory re: the origin of the universe that makes sense.

Finally, Someone Tells the Truth About Iraq

Unfortunately, that "someone" is an Iranian cleric:

A senior Iranian cleric welcomed on Friday the establishment of an Islamic republic in Iraq and hailed the country’s new constitution as one based on “Islamic precepts”.

Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, who heads the powerful ultra-conservative Guardian Council, told worshippers in Tehran’s Friday prayers, “Fortunately, after years of effort and expectations in Iraq, an Islamic state has come to power and the constitution has been established on the basis of Islamic precepts”.

Way to go, George W.

Monday, August 29, 2005

I'm Liking This Trend

From Editor and Publisher:

It's a question from the press sure to be posed more and more as the months go on, directed at public officials who continue to support the Iraq war: If you believe in the cause so deeply, why aren't your own kids signing up? Most prominently, President Bush (through his press spokesmen) is now hearing it, but it's now trickling down to the congressional and state level.

Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts, a strong backer of Bush policy in Iraq -- who has give sons age 24 to 35 -- heard the query yesterday, from a Boston Herald reporter. Romney, who has promoted National Guard recruitment, replied, a bit angrily, that he has not urged his own sons to enlist -- and isn't sure whether they would.

And on a related note, I have a question: Is the Iraq War Turning Ultra-Conservatives into Flaming Liberals? That question occurred to me after I watched this video.

In case you've never heard of Operation Yellow Elephant ("OYE"), its goal is to recruit College Republicans and Young Republicans to serve as infantry so that they can go to Iraq and fight in the war they so whole-heartedly support. In the above-referenced video, an hysterical exchange takes place between the OYE representative and a College Republican. The Republican actually berates the OYE Rep for not being (brace yourself) "sensitive" enough toward the people in their group who really want to go to Iraq but cannot serve because . . . .

Well, the young fascist doesn't really say why these people are incapable of serving (their families are too wealthy perhaps?), but my point is -- does this guy's presumably-Republican parents know he is talking this way? I mean -- when did right-winged Republicans ever give two shits about being sensitive toward anyone? Perhaps this guy was just being sarcastic, but he seemed pretty earnest to me on the video.

And while I'm on the subject, when did these right-wing extremists ever care about non-white people being repressed overseas? Hell, these people were absolutely livid when Clinton sent U.S. forces over to Kosovo to stop ethnic cleansing, yet for some reason they now get all weepy and choked up when it comes to all those poor Iraqis who were oppressed under Saddam's U.S.-assisted rule. In fact, these people are more than happy to spend hundreds of billions of U.S. tax dollars to help these poor, persecuted Iraqis. That sounds pretty liberal to me.

Radical Xtian Cult Planning Rashneesh-style Takeover in S. Carolina

This is interesting:

"After scrutinizing electoral records, demographic trends and property prices, Christian Exodus members identified two upstate South Carolina counties - they will not officially say which ones - as prime for a conservative takeover. By September 2006, Burnell hopes to have 2,000 activists in one county and 500 in the other."

When I read this, I immediately thought of the Bhagwan Shri Rashneesh and his takeover of an Oregon town called Antelope a couple of decades ago. That little experiment ended shortly after terrorist followers of the Bhagwan poisoned a few salad bars in The Dalles in an attempt to, well . . . terrorize, I guess.

I doubt these South Carolina characters will be sprinkling any salmonella bacteria in the local restaurants -- sure, they are evil, but they're not that evil (or are they?). But these folks are definitely planning on spreading around some poison:

"Christian Exodus activists plan to take control of sheriff's offices, city councils and school boards. Eventually, they say, they will control South Carolina. They will pass godly legislation, defying Supreme Court rulings on the separation of church and state."

Perhaps I am wrong, but aren't most of the local governments in The South exactly like that anyway? I mean, won't these guys be preaching to the choir, so to speak?

In any event, I wish them the best of luck. As readers of this blog know, I want to see a showdown between the radical religious wing of the Republican Party and the more moderate members of the GOP who are starting to wonder what the hell happened to their organization. If these "Christian Exodus" whackos succeed in their plan of taking over South Carolina and inserting the "God of the Old Testament" into that state's laws (what, no New Testament?), then such a showdown seems certain to occur.

Bring it on.

Did Chuck Hagel Really Earn Them Two Purple Hearts?

I think Viet Nam veteran/U.S. Senator Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) should be prepared to defend himself on that issue, particularly if he continues to compare the Iraq Debacle to the Viet Nam War. There is no way in hell those Swift Boat bastards (aka Karl Rove) will tolerate much more talk like that from Hagel. He's already taking some heat from radical right wingers such as these folks and this idiot.

My Dad suggested yesterday that the GOP might decide to run an anti-War candidate for president in order to neutralize what is sure to be major issue for the Democrats in 2008. Whether that happens will depend a lot on what occurs in the 2006 mid-terms, but it does appear that Hagel is positioning himself to be that candidate. I liked his move last week of meeting with his advisors and political contributors to discuss a possible run as an independent in 2008.

Hagel was clearly sending a signal to the G.O.P. that he is more than willing to cause a split in the Republican vote much like Perot did in 1992, unless the party supports his candidacy in 2008. And why not make a move like this. Despite its dream of becoming America's "dominant" party, the G.O.P. is so far out of the mainstream right now (think Terri Schiavo) that moderates like Hagel don't really fit in anymore. Perhaps the G.O.P. learned a lesson from the Jim Jeffords disaster, but I doubt it. Remember -- radical Republicans are never wrong on anything.

Anyway, it will be very interesting to watch all this unfold. Hagel appears to be a common-sense type of guy who doesn't like what his party is becoming, which means he has about as much of a chance of getting the GOP nomination in 2008 as does Rev. Al Sharpton. After all, the American Taliban controls the Republican Party these days, at least at the local levels, and there is no way these radical religious whackos would ever agree to support someone like Hagel. That's why his candidacy as an independent is so intriguing -- he's moderate enough to win a substantial number of Democratic votes, and Republicans who have grown tired of what their party has become would probably turn out for an independent Hagel in droves.

Sunday, August 28, 2005

I Thought We Were the Popular Front of Judea!

This is a good take on the recent "fascist-on-fascist" action down in Crawford.

Saturday, August 27, 2005

JTom Strikes Again

If you dug JTom's telephonic appearance on the Mike Malloy Show three weeks ago, then you'll enjoy what he had to say a couple days ago on the Randi Rhodes Show. You can download it here (click on the second link for Thursday, August 25, 2005 -- he appears 2:03:38 into the show).

Although he didn't deploy anywhere near as much profanity as he did on his Malloy Show appearance, JTom really ripped into the Bush Cartel and how it has quietly consolidated its power over everything in the last few months. Plus, he was able to get in another plug in for his book.

Rhodes' program that day focused heavily on the interview of former General Karpinski to which I referred on Thursday. If you haven't read it yet, you should -- I have a feeling this particular interview might draw some attention from the mainstream media in the coming weeks.

Thursday, August 25, 2005

We'll Be Seeing A Lot More of This in the Months Ahead

One thing I hate about radical right-wing GOP extremists is they can never admit their errors. But I love it when that kind of stubbornness gets them into trouble, especially when it happens to a scumbag like Senator Rick Santorum.

As the situation in Iraq spirals more and more out of control and the U.S. mid-term elections draw near, a lot of Republicans are going to be running away from their records of blind, unwavering support for Bush's Misadventure in Iraq. Santorum appears to be the first noteworthy member of Congress to attempt a re-invention of his record in that regard, and his effort has failed miserably:

Republican U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum's office acknowledged yesterday that it cannot locate public statements of the senator questioning the Iraq war, despite the senator's claim last week that he has publicly expressed his concerns.

But Santorum said that doesn't mean he hasn't made the comments. In an interview last week, he said he had publicly and privately raised questions about efforts to contain the insurgency and to limit Baathist involvement in the new Iraqi government. He made his remarks in response to a charge by his leading Democratic challenger, Robert P. Casey Jr., that Santorum has failed to "ask the tough questions" about Iraq.

Robert L. Traynham, Santorum's spokesman, said a search of Nexis, a news database, and the office's press clippings had not turned up any account of those comments. He noted, however, that the office's records are incomplete because the office is unable to record everything the senator says.

And if that isn't enough horseshit for you, then get a load of this:

Santorum was a vocal opponent of the Kosovo conflict, he said, because it lacked a compelling national interest. He criticized Clinton in March 1999 for taking military action in Kosovo "with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy."

Iraq is different, Santorum said last week, "because this is something we have to do to protect our country. I feel strongly about that."

Former Bush Speechwriter Nails It

David Frum, the Bush Speechwriter who helped originate the phrase, "Axis of Evil," knows what he is talking about (via Political Wire):

"Former Bush speechwriter David Frum says that by now 'it should be clear that President Bush's words on the subject of Iraq have ceased connecting with the American public.'

"The main problem: 'Again and again during the Bush presidency ... the president will agree to give what is advertised in advance as a major speech. An important venue will be chosen. A crowd of thousands will be gathered. The networks will all be invited. And after these elaborate preparations, the president says... nothing that he has not said a hundred times before.'

"'If a president continues to do that, he is himself teaching the public and the media to ignore him - especially when the words seem utterly to ignore the past three months of real-world events.'"

General Karpinski Speaks Out

I should say "Colonel" Karpinski -- she was after all demoted for her role in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. She has a few things to say.

And here is another soldier who isn't all that happy about the situation in Iraq:

OLBERMANN: For surviving veterans of Iraq, the return home is not easy. Nobody is saying it‘s like the March on Washington from the so-called Bonus Army in 1932, World War I vets demanding an immediate payment of a bonus that was scheduled for 1945, some of them eventually shooting it out with General Douglas MacArthur‘s troops within sight of the Capitol. That all actually happened.

But what if I told you that one of the two soldiers who hauled Saddam Hussein out of hiding is, more than a year after his return from Iraq, and more than eight weeks after he started looking for a civilian job, unemployed tonight?

Specialist Jeans Cruz joins us from New York tonight.

Thank you for your time, sir.

SPEC. JEANS CRUZ (RET.), UNEMPLOYED IRAQ WAR VETERAN: And thank you, Keith.

OLBERMANN: We‘ll get to the job in a moment. But first, we now have in this country what we certainly didn‘t have when you left for Iraq, maybe when you got back, a very loud debate on how much longer we should stay in that country. You‘ve more than earned your right to be heard on this. What do you think?

CRUZ: To be honest, it is time to pull out now. As you said, no one needs to die for others who have died. Everybody has their sacrifices. And we do not need to sacrifice more people. We know what everybody else has sacrificed, and we have to praise that right now.

There Is At Least One Serious-Minded Republican in Congress

Congressman Jim Leach of Iowa wants an inquiry into the facts behind the Downing Street Memos. Sure, he could merely be responding to pressure from his district to look into this -- he has to run again in 2006, after all -- but he does deserve a lot of credit for being the first Republican in Congress to call for an investigation regarding this important issue.

The Traitors at the American Legion

I know that is a harsh word, but the conclusion seems inescapable.

Yesterday, the American Legion attacked U.S. citizens who have exercised their rights and have spoken out against the Iraq Debacle: "The American Legion will stand against anyone and any group that would demoralize our troops, or worse, endanger their lives by encouraging terrorists to continue their cowardly attacks against freedom-loving peoples." In other words, the American Legion considers Cindy Sheehan and folks like her to be traitors.

These idiots, however, took a different position back in 1999 when Clinton sent U.S. forces to Yugoslavia to participate in Operation Allied Force. Back then, the American Legion urged "the immediate withdrawal of American troops" participating in that operation: "In no case should America commit its Armed Forces in the absence of clearly defined objectives agreed upon by the U.S. Congress in accordance with Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution of the United States."

Billmon has the goods here.

So let's sum up --

American combat deaths in Clinton's Operation Allied Force: zero

American combat deaths in Bush's Operation Iraqi Freedom: 1873 and counting.

My conclusions from all this? The American Legion hates Clinton, loves Bush, and doesn't give a damn about the troops.

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Right On

The time has come for the radical religious right to be referred to in these terms much more often. There has been a reluctance in the past to aggressively attack these people, but there is too much at stake now. In fact, I feel our crop of religious nut-jobs presents a far greater threat to this country than any group of Islamic fundamentalists ever could. Islamic fundamentalists, after all, do not hold high positions in our Federal government. Christian fundamentalists currently do. Countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia have problems with home-grown fundamentalism. The U.S. is no different.

Our religious extremists are not dangerous because of what they say and/or believe -- I'd fight to the death to preserve their freedom to speak their minds. [Well, maybe not to the death -- perhaps a near fatal wounding]. But Kos is right -- the problem stems from what these whackos are willing to do to force their cult-like beliefs into our laws and into the lives of the American people:

"Is there any doubt that the American Taliban has more in common with our Islamic fundamentalist enemies? They're cut from the same cloth -- the belief that a system of secular rules and laws must be replaced with 'God's laws.'

"And while the religions may be different, the core of them is not -- opposition to rival faiths, hostility to science, interference in people's private lives, control over women's bodies, an irrational belief in the supremacy of the male over female, militancy, anti-intellectualism and a rejection of logic, an unassailable belief in their own righteousness, and the deifying of certain unelectable, unaccountable individuals as 'spokesmen for god,' be it Pat Robertson or the Ayatollahs."

Amen.

Did the GOP's Strategy for the 2006 Mid-Terms Just Go Down the Drain?

I theorized last week that BushCo will pull the same stunt in the run-up to the 2006 mid-term elections that they did for the 2002 mid-terms, namely, take the country's mind off all of its problems by forcing a vote in Congress on whether to invade a Middle Eastern country. In 2002, the country was Iraq (we all know how that turned out). I thought that this time it would be Iran. Such a strategy, however, has become more difficult to implement because of this:

"Traces of bomb-grade uranium found two years ago in Iran came from contaminated Pakistani equipment and are not evidence of a clandestine nuclear weapons program, a group of U.S. government experts and other international scientists has determined.

"'The biggest smoking gun that everyone was waving is now eliminated with these conclusions,' said a senior official who discussed the still-confidential findings on the condition of anonymity."

Although the lack of WMD didn't stop the Bush Administration from invading Iraq, the situation is different now. The events of 9-11 are nearly four years in the past, so Americans aren't as shell-shocked (and therefore not as gullible) now as they were in 2002. Bush's current popularity isn't what it was either, so I think our representatives in Congress are going to need some pretty strong evidence of an Iranian threat before backing BushCo on something like this. Of course, the most obvious argument against an invasion of Iran is that big chunk of America's combat strength is currently bogged down in the Iraq Quagmire and it doesn't look like that will end any time soon.

Where Can I Get Me A Couple of These?

You really gotta love this (by way of Atrios):



I don't know if it is just me, but I can't stand listening to Bush speak for more than five seconds at a time; so if I want to find out what he said in any detail, I usually have to locate a transcript somewhere. But if I had a couple of these Bullshit Protectors, I just might be able to sit through one of Bush's speeches in its entirety.

GOP Launches Coordinated Attack Against Cindy Sheehan

Read all about it here. It is pretty pathetic -- nowhere near the quality of the Swift Boat attacks.

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

And the Award for Asshole of the Year Goes To . . .

Just kidding -- it is way too early to be handing out that one. But Pat Robertson obviously thinks that all of his antics -- including publicly asking God to whack a couple of U.S. Supreme Court Justices -- just ain't gonna get him there. He's probably right about that, given that people like Tom DeLay and cross molester Larry Northern are clearly angling for this prestigious award.

So in an obvious effort to stay in the running, Pat Robertson now demands this:

"Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson called on Monday for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, calling him a 'terrific danger' to the United States.

"Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition of America and a former presidential candidate, said on 'The 700 Club' it was the United States’ duty to stop Chavez from making Venezuela a 'launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism.'"

Way to go, Pat!

UPDATE: Robertson explains what he really meant.

Lyrics for "Sweet Neo Con"

Raw Story has the complete lyrics to the upcoming Rolling Stones hit, Sweet Neo Con:

"You ride around your white castle, On your little white horse / You lie to your people, and blame it on your war of course

"You call yourself a Christian, I call you a hypocrite / You call yourself a patriot, well I think you’re full of shit

"Oh, sweet Neo Con, What path have you led them on? Oh, sweet Neo Con, Is it time for the atom bomb?

"You parade around in costume, Expecting to be believed / But as the body bags stack up, We believe we’ve been deceived

"The horror you’ve unleased, Will backfire with more grief / When will you ever learn, Sweet Neo Con, as the world burns?

"Oh, sweet Neo Con, What path have you led them on? Oh, sweet Neo Con, Is it time for the atom bomb? Oh, sweet Neo Con, What path have you led them on? Oh, sweet Neo Con, Is it time to drop the bomb?"

Bush's Approval Rating Drops to 36%

Rove won't be able to tolerate this free-fall much longer. I'm sure we'll be hearing about some new, grave terrorist threat very soon.

UPDATE: Bush is now less popular than Nixon was during Watergate.

Monday, August 22, 2005

My Apologies to CNN

I was finally able to watch Dead Wrong - Inside an Intelligence Meltdown that CNN aired last night. I assumed last week that CNN would probably chicken out, would probably not look into the Bush Administration's manipulations of intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq War, and would probably lay the blame solely on George Tenet and his CIA.

Sure, Tenet took a pretty big hit in the documentary, but overall I thought CNN did a (dare I say) fair and balanced job in covering the issue. I was pleasantly surprised when the events that led to the drafting of the Downing Street Memo (as well as the memo itself) were covered early in the program. The fact that Cheney was putting pressure on CIA analysts was also mentioned (Cheney declined to be interviewed for the show), as was the fact that there has yet to be a real investigation as to whether the Bush Administration manipulated intel.

The main thrust of the documentary was that in 2002, it became clear to everyone in the intelligence community that Bush was going to invade Iraq. What happened next is that intelligence was "cherry-picked" in order to formulate worst case scenarios, and skepticism was never encouraged. Tenet, meanwhile, developed too close of a relationship with the policy-makers -- he personally briefed Bush every morning, and for the most part had no problem telling him what he wanted to hear. One analyst stated, "the White House didn't go to the CIA and say, 'Tell me the truth' -- it said, 'give me ammunition."' Unreliable sources were therefore relied upon in order to satisfy Bush, whom Tenet called "the first customer."

One thing that really jumped out from the presentation was the extent to which Colin Powell was misled on these issues. An e-mail from a CIA analyst questioning the credibility of a source known as "Curveball" was not shown to Powell prior to his now-infamous speech to the U.N. Security Council, and Powell relied heavily on this source during the speech, particularly on the issue of mobile biological weapons labs. In a response to this particular e-mail, the analyst's superior admitted the problem with Curveball, but wrote, "this war is going to happen regardless -- the powers that be probably aren't terribly interested in whether Curveball knows what he is talking about."

Although the documentary didn't launch a blatant attack on the Bush Administration, it nonetheless made Bush and his people look like a bunch of warmongering idiots who were determined to invade Iraq regardless of what the intelligence was showing. Obviously, making these people look like warmongering idiots was not a hard thing to do given the subject matter, but it was astounding to see all the choice pre-war assertions from Condi, Cheney, Powell, and Bush ("mushroom clouds," "uranium from Africa," etc.) shown one after another on the screen, all of them turning out to be dead wrong.

Maybe I'm being too obvious here, but it seems pretty clear from CNN's presentation that Bush and Tenet were in cahoots on the whole plan to fool Congress and the American people into backing a war against Iraq, and that Tenet agreed at some point during this whole unfortunate process to take the fall for Bush if everything went sideways. Maybe they thought that WMD would turn up after the invasion, even though they knew the pre-war intel was weak regarding the existence of these weapons.

What Bush promised Tenet in return is unclear. A Medal of Freedom was probably part of the deal. Perhaps Bush also agreed not to fire Tenet as long as he agreed to eventually resign (prior to the 2004 election, of course) and to keep his mouth shut thereafter (he currently declines all interviews on this subject). It is clear that some kind of understanding was reached between Bush and Tenet. America's credibility turned out to be a big loser in that deal, as have the families of the 1868 American soldiers who have died so far due to BushCo's fraud.

A Big War Protest . . . in Utah?

That's what it says here:

"In downtown Salt Lake City's Pioneer Park, between 1,000 and 2,000 anti-war protesters gathered to speak and demonstrate against the continuing fighting in Iraq.

"Organizers were thrilled at the turnout and Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson called on Utahns to make the protest a turning point in national opposition to Bush policies in Iraq and on environmental issues."

Could Larry Northern Have a Future in GOP Politics?

The folks at the Democratic Underground have perfectly described a new ultra-conservative mindset that is emerging as a result of the Iraq Debacle:

"Last week Larry Northern . . . was charged with criminal mischief after he drove to Camp Casey in the middle of the night, attached a pipe and chains to the back of his pickup truck, and drove through the Arlington West memorial, mowing down crosses in his wake. How about that for supporting the troops?

"Larry Northern appears to be typical of this new conservative movement: they know the war was a mistake; they know that Bush screwed it up big time - but they just can't admit it. And so they have to try to tear down anyone who chips away at the denial they've built up so strongly in their peanut-brains. If that means they have to drive over a memorial to American troops who have died in Iraq, so be it."

By the way, if the guy pictured below recklessly wets himself during one of his anti-protest protests, could that be considered desecration of the flag?

Friday, August 19, 2005

Bush Finally Succeeds at Something

It's about time.

The most time, that is.

Do You Think CNN Will Mention the Downing Street Memo This Sunday Night?

CNN is running "Dead Wrong -- Inside An Intelligence Meltdown" this weekend. When I first heard of this program, I figured it would simply turn out be the Corporate Media's version of a "Senator Pat Roberts-type" inquiry, i.e., an investigation where the Bush Regime's intelligence manipulations in the run-up to the Iraq Debacle would be ignored and George Tenet and his CIA would once again get all the blame. However, the opening paragraph of this article about the documentary gave me some hope:

"A former top aide to Colin Powell says his involvement in the former secretary of state's presentation to the United Nations on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction was 'the lowest point" in his life. 'I wish I had not been involved in it,' says Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, a longtime Powell adviser who served as his chief of staff from 2002 through 2005.'"

But my doubts returned when I read the article's last paragraph:

"George [Tenet] actually did call the Secretary [of State], and said, 'I'm really sorry to have to tell you. We don't believe there were any mobile labs for making biological weapons,'" Wilkerson says in the documentary. "This was the third or fourth telephone call. And I think it's fair to say the Secretary and Mr. Tenet, at that point, ceased being close. I mean, you can be sincere and you can be honest and you can believe what you're telling the Secretary. But three or four times on substantive issues like that? It's difficult to maintain any warm feelings."

So, it looks like Medal of Freedom winner George Tenet will continue to be BushCo's fall guy.

More Election Thefts In Our Future?

Krugman is right -- one of the most troubling aspects of Florida Election Theft 2000 is that no one was punished for it (nor was anyone punished for last year's mischief in Ohio and elsewhere), meaning that certain people might be compelled to try it again in '06 and '08:

"Our current political leaders would suffer greatly if either house of Congress changed hands in 2006, or if the presidency changed hands in 2008. The lids would come off all the simmering scandals, from the selling of the Iraq war to profiteering by politically connected companies. The Republicans will be strongly tempted to make sure that they win those elections by any means necessary. And everything we've seen suggests that they will give in to that temptation."

Thursday, August 18, 2005

A Fundamental Shift in Christianity

Three years ago, they considered him their savior. You might say that they worshipped him. Oh, how quickly folks can turn on someone.

Jesus Christ has fallen out of favor with Fundamentalist Christians, and this remarkable development can be traced to one thing -- the War in Iraq.

"I used to believe in most everything Jesus taught," said Emma Smith of Pensacola, Florida, "but now I'm not so sure about a lot of it." Smith stopped referring to Christ as "The Lord" about two-and-a-half years ago, when many Christian groups announced their moral opposition to President Bush's plan to invade Iraq.

"I think the late Pope and other religious leaders were right when they made the assumption that Christ would have opposed the Iraq War," said Smith, as she was putting the finishing touches on a shrine she was making in honor of Terri Schiavo. "This is because Jesus proclaimed, 'Blessed are the Peacemakers' -- but I just can't buy into that anymore, nor can I accept the whole 'turn the other cheek' deal."

Smith is not alone. According to recent polls, nearly 80% of the Evangelical Christians in this country now believe that the teachings of Christ have little relevance in today's world. "Well, he did say some pretty ok things," said Gerry Vynes, the former president of the Southeastern Baptist Convention, "but let's face it -- so did Buddha and that Muhammad character." Vynes spoke highly of President Bush's interpretation of the New Testament: "I think our Commander-in-Chief got it right when he referred to Jesus' teachings as 'philosophy.'"

Vynes takes particular issue with Christ's statement that you cannot know the time of his return. "Jesus was just plain wrong on that one," said Vynes. "Scriptures clearly say that the time is now and the place is the Middle East." Vynes, however, is hoping for a Jesus-less Armageddon: "I hope he stays where he is -- I just don't see the Christ of the Gospels coming down and doing any serious ass-kicking."

He also revealed that he is "mildly upset" with the Bush Administration's Road Map for peace in the Middle East. "Don't get me wrong, " said Vynes, "George Bush is a great man -- he talks to God and God talks to him -- but you can't have Armageddon and peace at the same time."

Although Smith and Vynes still agree that Jesus was a moral man, a growing number of Evangelical Christians now reject Christ outright. "Jesus, long hair and all, would have been right there with all of those peace activists camped out with that traitorous Shee-han woman in Crawford," said Joseph Myrr, a missionary who was working in Iraq until the deteriorating security situation required him to leave. "That image does not sit well with some of us."

Great Beer Commercial

This is one big ad.

Two Good Posts on the Crawford Vigil

This one from Paul Begala is worth reading, as is this post at Whiskey Bar.

Meanwhile, drug fiend Rush Limbaugh cannot seem to figure out an effective way to attack Cindy Sheehan. The best he can do these days is bring up the CBS forged documents story and hope some of his brain-dead listeners can make a connection where none exists.

I'm sure Rush, Malkin, O'Reilly, Hannity, and the rest of the wingnuts are getting pretty tired of spinning their wheels trying to do Bush's dirty work, especially given that this whole thing would have gone away had Bush simply met with Sheehan at the beginning of her vigil. Needless to say, Bush has given the Anti-War Movement a real boost by refusing to meet with Sheehan.

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Could This Be One of the Seven Signs of the Apocalypse?

Armstrong Williams wants the U.S. out of Iraq (and yes, I'm pretty sure this is legit and not some sort of satire). Of course, Williams couldn't help but blast the previous Administration on the way to his flip-flop [is it ok to call it a flip-flop when a Radical Right-Winger like Williams does it, or should it be called a "sincere change of heart" instead?].

Now that I think about it, however, it is very possible that Williams is still doing the Bush Regime's bidding and wrote this article at the request of the White House. He has certainly done things like this before, and was paid well for his efforts. It seems clear to me, given BushCo's recent admission that its expectations were unrealistic when it invaded Iraq, that Bush wants to start pulling out of Iraq before the 2006 mid-term elections. Williams is apparently helping Bush set the stage for that withdrawal.

Bush at 41%

How low can he go? I mean, there is a percentage of people in this country who will support him no matter what. I'm thinking that percentage is about 35.

From Political Wire:

"President Bush’s job approval has dropped to 41% nationwide, according to the results of 50 separate but concurrent, statewide public opinion polls conducted by SurveyUSA. Bush’s approval rating ranges from a high of 59% in Idaho to a low of 29% in Rhode Island.

"Bush is above 50% in 7 states.
Bush is at 50% in 2 states.
Bush is below 50% in 41 states."

Two 9-11 Movies in the Works

Oliver Stone is working on September, which will tell the story of two rescue workers who were trapped under the World Trade Center rubble. Flight 93 will be a real time depiction of the terrorist hijacking of the United Airlines flight. Both films will be completed by 2006. Whether they will be released in 2006 is still up in the air.

An ABC mini-series about 9-11 is also in production:

"The project — which has never been formally announced by ABC and will air no sooner than January 2006 — stars Harvey Keitel as John O'Neill, the FBI agent who hunted al-Qaeda for years and was killed in the attacks while working as head of security for the World Trade Center."

The Anti-War Movement: Little Things Like This Will Make All the Difference

One of Bush's neighbors offered his land near Bush's ranch for Cindy Sheehan to use during her vigil:

"According to the source, the land offered to Sheehan is owned by Fred Mattlage, who is a distant cousin of Larry Mattlage, a man who fired a shotgun over the weekend in frustration over the commotion caused by the vigil.

"The source said Fred Mattlage made the offer saying 'I'm a veteran, I support what you all are doing and I want to offer you my land.'"

Meanwhile, Bush is Biking Toward Nowhere.

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Clark Gearing Up For a '08 Run?

It looks that way.

Clark was the one I was hoping would get the Democratic nomination in '04, even though he was a little rough around the edges. Kerry was my third choice (behind Dean). I still haven't forgiven John Kerry for being a political coward and voting for the Iraq invasion, particularly given that he voted against the first Gulf War.

The Rude Pundit Goes On Tour

Here is a New York Times article on one of my favorite bloggers, The Rude Pundit. He's great, but you might want to avoid his blog if you are easily offended.

The PNAC/BushCo Failure in Iraq is Now Complete

Well, first we were told that we had to invade Iraq because Saddam's stockpile of WMD directly threatened the security of the United States. That turned out to be a lie. We were also told that Saddam was directly involved in the 9-11 attacks. That also turned out to be a lie (a lie that Bush surrogates continue to tell).

So what did the Bush Administration fall back on to justify the invasion? Bush really started pushing the idea that we invaded Iraq in order to free a population from the grip of an evil dictator. That rationale, although ridiculous on its face, was quickly embraced by the radical right as the "real" reason for our invasion. Bush also whipped out the old PNAC rationale that an invasion of Iraq would ultimately cause a wave of democracy to spread over the Middle East.

Now we get this:

"The United States no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society where the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges, U.S. officials say."

The article continues:

"What we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground," said a senior official involved in policy since the 2003 invasion. "We are in a process of absorbing the factors of the situation we're in and shedding the unreality that dominated at the beginning."

Well, at least these idiots finally figured a few things out. You know, everything would be ok as long as the goal of the Iraq Invasion was to replace the secular Saddam with a pro-Iranian government run by a bunch of religious fanatics, or to establish the Mother of All Terrorist Breeding Grounds, because that is precisely what the U.S. invasion of Iraq accomplished. But I looked over the list of 28 or so reasons why the Bush Regime said it invaded Iraq, and those goals were never mentioned.

I think what is happening here is that BushCo is setting the stage for a withdrawal of American troops that will occur during the run-up the the U.S. mid-term elections, probably next summer (don't you just love how Amerika's foreign policy is based, not on common sense, but on the U.S. election cycle?). What will then happen is basically a repeat of what BushCo did before the 2002 mid-terms, namely, they will force an October 2006 vote in Congress to authorize an invasion of a Middle Eastern country, this time Iran. I thought such a strategy would be out of the question until I realized that an invasion of Iran would be precisely the wrong thing to do, so now I'm sure that Bush will do it. Doing precisely the wrong thing is the one thing he is really good at.

Monday, August 15, 2005

Pundits with Blood on Their Hands

Although he doesn't mention her by name because she is a reporter, Harold Meyerson explains why it is OK for Judith Miller to be spending a little time in jail right now:

"For its war in Iraq, the Bush administration relied on and benefited from the cheerleading of a group of pundits and public intellectuals who, at every crucial moment, subordinated the facts on the ground to their own ideological preferences and those of their allies within the administration. They refused to hold the administration’s conduct of the war and the occupation to the ideals that they themselves professed, or simply to the standard of common sense. They abdicated their responsibilities as political intellectuals -- and, more elementally, as reliable empiricists."

Babies on "No-Fly" List Stopped From Boarding Planes

This kind of reminded me of that scene from Airplane 2: The Sequel where airport security, while pouncing on an old lady who set off the metal detector, allowed several heavily armed terrorists to simply walk through the security check and onto airplanes.

Last June's Bass/Poker Tourney

Here are photos of the winning fish from the 2nd Annual Crane Prairie Bass/No-Limit Hold 'Em Tourney that was held on June 4, 2005:





Tim Williams won the poker event, but no pictures of him winning the hold em tournament will be posted because:

(1) Tim hasn't yet found the nerve to defend his title; and

(2) Nobody took any pictures of him winning the poker tournament.

Photo From 20th Gonzaga Reunion



From left to right: Sean Allen, JTom, Joe Canada, JB, Charlie Hall, Harold G., Wave Lude, and Ron Buddy.

Two Must-Read Articles

The first one is this piece from the Village Voice (sounds like Asscroft might be in a bit of trouble when it comes to the Valerie Plame TraitorGate Scandal).

The second one is this Frank Rich op/ed. You know things are bad over in Iraq when the military is willing to waive the "Don't Ask -- Don't Tell" policy. It will be interesting to see how the radical right responds to this policy shift -- I'm sure Coulter and Company will be outraged, but such outrage will show that they don't really support the troops and are therefore traitors.

Sunday, August 14, 2005

Poker Tourney at KahNeeTa

I played in a no-limit hold em tournament with 24 players at Kahneeta last Thursday evening. I made it to the final table, but I was short-stacked when I got there. I decided to play pretty aggressively from the start, mostly because you only get about 1900 chips for the buy-in and the blinds start at 25/50 and go up every 15 minutes. In other words, it is not a tourney wherein you want to play too conservatively. The blinds will eat you up in no time.

My aggressive strategy worked pretty well at first -- I tripled my buy-in after about 45 minutes of play, and a lot of those chips came from a big hand I won after calling a raise pre-flop with an 8-7 offsuit in the pocket, something I don't do very often (I bet heavily after the flop hit J-8-4 and got a couple of callers, then got these callers to fold after betting very heavily when a 7 hit on the turn). My problem was that after I had accumulated about 6000 in chips, I decided to try to protect my stack and play more conservatively.

That was a big mistake, mostly because I didn't get dealt any premium hands while I was in my conservative mode. When we consolidated to one final table, I had 4500 in chips left and the blinds were 200/400. After a few hands of crappy cards, I got dealt AK offsuit in early position and decided it was time to make a move. I raised 2000 and got one caller. After the flop came up Q-low-low with no flush draw on the board, the one remaining player checked and I went all in. My opponent thought awhile, then called me (he had 200 less in his stack, so I got 200 back from my all-in). He had K-J of clubs, which made me very happy because I had one of his Ks covered was therefore way ahead in the hand. He needed either a jack to beat me or two running clubs. Well, he got the two running clubs to make his flush.

My 200 in remaining chips didn't last long after that. It was disappointing, because a double up at that point would have given me about 9000 in chips and put me back in the hunt. The guy was obviously an inexperienced player, because he called all his chips in without having anything in his hand.

Kahneeta is reportedly closing down its casino soon. I definitely want to play in at least one more tourney there before it closes. The next time, I won't make the mistake of easing up if I accumulate a sizable chip stack.

Thursday, August 11, 2005

Latest Attack on Sheehan

Here's Drudge's latest attack on Cindy Sheehan. So, let me see if I understand it -- Drudge's position is that Sheehan should stop her vigil and keep her mouth shut because the rest of Sheehan's family are a bunch of pro-Bush, warmongering assholes. Nice.

What is it with these people? On my way to work yesterday -- as I was listening to a radio report saying that several more American soldiers have died in Iraq -- a big pick-up with a "Support the Troops" ribbon magnet attached to it was sitting in traffic ahead of me. This is not a rare occurrence for the streets of Bend. One of the few drawbacks of living in Central Oregon is that you see a lot of these ribbon magnets (usually attached to huge pick-ups or SUVs). I know that people originally purchased these ribbons -- not really as a show of support for the troops -- but in order to respond to people like me who opposed Bush's folly in Iraq from the start. But what do these ribbons really stand for now that all the lies have been exposed?

Recent polls are showing that only 40% of Americans now approve of the Bush's handling of the Iraq War. Although that is a pretty low approval number for our so-called "war-time" president, you really have to start wondering why so many people are still on board with Bush's handling of this war. Oh sure, I know a good percentage of the country would support Bush no matter what he did, and yes -- last I heard, over 40% of the nation still thinks that Saddam was somehow involved in the 9-11 attacks (including at least one Congressman).

Perhaps such a high percentage still approve of Bush's job in Iraq because they spent a lot of effort in the past defending Bush's decision to attack and they are now simply afraid to admit that they were duped into backing one of the greatest foreign policy blunders in American history. But I'm starting to think that a good number of the 40% are fine with the fact that Bush lied to get us into Iraq, because they like the idea of an America that goes around the world kicking ass -- even if we are doing so incompetently. And if it takes a few lies in order to trick Americans into backing an invasion of Iraq, then that is OK with these folks, so long as they or their kids don't have to go overseas and fight.

Gold Star Families For Peace

Bill Mitchell, one of the founding members of Gold Star Families for Peace, was on Bernie Ward's program on KGO last night talking about Cindy Sheehan and her vigil out at Bush's phony ranch near Crawford, Texas. Mitchell did a great job responding to critics who say that if he and Sheehan get their way and the U.S. did pull out of Iraq, then their sons would have died in vain. His simple response: "My son has already died in vain." I think Bernie is right and we may be reaching a real turning point in this country regarding the Iraq War.

Bush is apparently hoping that the great right wing echo chamber will make this woman and her friends give up, but the radical right is really having a problem figuring out how to do Bush's dirty work regarding Cindy Sheehan. Extremist Michelle Malkin is basically taking the position that Sheehan's dead son would not have approved of what his mother was doing on his behalf (nice try). Folks like Oxycontin Rush and Drudge are trying to call her a flip-flopper; but even if she did change her mind about Bush and his folly in Iraq (she didn't), Bush's rapidly falling poll numbers regarding his handling of Iraq tell me that she would not be the only person in this country who has had a change of heart. And, reportedly, that pervert over at FauxNews, Bill O'Reilly, has called Cindy Sheehan a "traitor" for what she is doing. What's next? Are the Swift Boat Veterans for "Truth" going to come out of their holes and allege that Cindy Sheehan's son isn't really dead?

So, while the great right wing echo chamber is trying to figure out what to do about this thorn in its side, Bush is hiding at his ranch hoping that this will all go away. Of course, Bush could end this whole thing himself by simply meeting with this woman. If Bush really did believe that what he is doing in Iraq in right and that 1843 American soldier really did die for a good cause, why wouldn't he want to go out and meet with Cindy Sheehan?

I guess I just answered my own question.

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Secret U.S Military Unit Identified Atta One Year Before 9-11

Anyone who knows me is aware that I've had a problem with the "official" government story regarding the 9-11 attacks. Very little about what the government has told us seems to add up. But time goes by and I start to realize that there will never be a serious investigation, so I do what every good Amerikan should do -- I just let it go, and focus instead on the Mainstream Media's coverage of whatever young, pretty white woman is currently missing.

Then I read something like this, and it all comes rushing back. Of course, the secret military unit that identified Mohammad Atta and three other future 9-11 hijackers did so as the Clinton Administration was winding down, meaning that the right wing echo chamber can simply blame Bubba for this. But it appears that this information was kept from the Commission investigating 9-11, meaning that the decision to cover this whole thing up was made under Bush's watch.

Why would officials in the Bush Administration decide to cover up something that happened at the end of the Clinton Administration? Wouldn't something like that support the Bush Regime's dominant theory regarding 9-11, namely, that the whole thing was Clinton's fault? It will be interesting to see where this goes.

_____________________________


Follow up -- So who is lying? Is it Rumsfeld, the 9-11 Commission members, or the Pentagon spokesman:

If the team did identify Atta and the others, it's unclear why the
information wasn't forwarded. The prohibition against sharing intelligence on
"U.S. persons" should not have applied since they were in the country on visas
and did not have permanent resident status. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said he was unaware of the intelligence until the latest reports surfaced. But Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said the 9/11 Commission looked into the
matter during its investigation into government missteps leading to the attacks
and chose not to include it in the final report.

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

"Sweet Neo Con"

Drudge is all upset about the Rolling Stones' upcoming anti-Bush song (sorry for the hyperlink to Drudge's site -- I personally think the guy is scum, but he's good for an occasional laugh).

Public Housing Residents Harassed into Bible Study

I'm getting tired of crap like this. I don't know why stuff like this always sets me off, but it does. The whole Terri Schiavo deal angered me to no end, but that evil series of events had a happy ending in that the idiocy of Bush, Bush, Frist, that monk dude with the big cross hanging off of his neck, FauxNews, and all the rest of those religious extremists was exposed for all to see. I'm sorry, but I no longer view people like that as Christians, but as part of a cult that is loosely based on Christianity.

I think the Schiavo Debacle helped a lot in making Bush one of the most unpopular presidents in a generation. But the influence of the Radical Christian Right on the GOP is so strong that Jeb Bush, like a moth to the flame, continued to go after Michael Schiavo even after Terri's death. Jeb's head eventually cleared and he abandoned his investigation of Michael, but the fact that he did it gave me some hope that radical Christianity will eventually drive the extremist wing of the GOP over a cliff.

Shuttle Lands in One Piece

I agree with this. The coverage of the shuttle flight has been a bit morbid. I never really felt that the whole thing might break apart on reentry, mostly because they did an inspection of the tiles up there and everything looked fine. Sure, the last one didn't survive reentry, but all the ones previously launched that made orbit (over 100, I believe) returned safely (Challenger was lost just after launch due to a problem with one of the SRBs).

What surprised me most about all this is that last week's space walk to inspect the bottom of the shuttle was the first time anyone has done that -- the press was acting like a spacewalk to the bottom of the shuttle was akin to a trip to Pluto. It is also hard to believe that no tile repair kit had been deployed until this flight.

Monday, August 08, 2005

Catholic Church Finally Advocates Use of Birth Control

Well, sort of:

In 1994, then-Archbishop of Portland William Levada offered a simple answer
for why the archdiocese shouldn't have been ordered to pay the costs of raising
a child fathered by a church worker at a Portland, Ore., parish. In her
relationship with Arturo Uribe, then a seminarian and now a Whittier priest, the
child's mother had engaged "in unprotected intercourse … when [she] should have
known that could result in pregnancy," the church maintained in its answer to
the lawsuit.

Kind of a bummer when common sense gets in the way of dogma.

[Thanks to Julie for the heads-up on this one]

Martin's Blog

Check out my friend Martin's blog. He's a bit more conservative than I am, but, to use his words, he's the kind "whose philosophy predates the GOP's hijacking at the hands of Religious Extremists." He certainly is no fan of George W. Bush (or Anheuser-Busch, for that matter).

BTW, I consider myself more of a radical moderate than a flaming liberal, but either description works.

WSJ Editorial Page Defends Novak

This is good for a laugh.

Tora Bora Revisited

I doubt this will do much to resurrect the story of how BushCo let bin Laden get away at Tora Bora. Most readers will simply respond, "OK, but what have they failed to do lately?" But it serves as a reminder of just how incompetent Rumsfeld and the rest of them have been at running the Conflict Formerly Known as the War on Terror.

Sunday, August 07, 2005

Mother of Dead Soldier Protests at Bush's Ranch

You know, I have to be honest. Sure, I feel sorry for the U.S. soldiers who are killed or injured in Iraq. These people undoubtedly expected that a U.S. president would use common sense and would not send them to war unless it was absolutely necessary. But then again, when you volunteer for military service, you take the chance that your president may act like a complete moron (or worse) and may send you off to die overseas for no good reason.

But I do really feel sorry for folks like Cindy Sheehan, whose son was killed in an ambush in Sadr City. She is on CNN right now talking with Wolf Blitzer. She said that her family was against the war from the start, but that her son Casey went over because he didn't want to abandon his buddies (plus I'm sure he didn't have much of a choice). Her description of a meeting she had with Bush after Casey's death was amazing (but not surprising). Bush acted like it was a party and not a meeting to talk about Casey's death. He didn't really seem to care. Sheehan is now at Bush's Ranch trying to arrange another meeting with Bush (good luck). I'm sure she'll bring down the wrath of Oxycontin Rush and the rest of the right wing echo chamber for having the gall to speak out against Bush and his policies.

UPDATE: That didn't take long.

Scooter Libby Was Judith Miller's Source

It would really suck to be sent to Federal prison when you have a name like Scooter, but it looks like that could happen now that Libby has apparently been identified as Judith Miller's source in the Plame TreasonGate Scandal. Armando at Kos wants Miller released now, but I hope that doesn't happen. In fact, I'm angry that Miller will only spend a few more weeks in jail, given the role she played in helping BushCo lie its way into Iraq. They should throw away the key. [Anyone who thinks that I'm being unfair -- i.e., that Miller's despicable behavior in the run-up to the Iraq Quagmire is unrelated to her role in the TraitorGate Scandal -- is not seeing the big picture here. It is all related, in my opinion. And even if it isn't related, I look at the time she's spending in jail now as a sort of cosmic justice.]

By the way, if you don't despise Judith Miller now, I promise that you will after reading this.

Saturday, August 06, 2005

Bush's Radio Address

By the way, Billmon rocks.

JTom on the Mike Malloy Show

My friend JTom, author of Rapture or Renaissance -- A View from the Sky, called into The Mike Malloy Show last Wednesday night (scroll down to the link for Wednesday, August 3, 2005 to download the entire program -- JTom's call can be heard at about 1:13.50 into the show). Malloy liked what JTom had to say -- he even kept him on the phone through the newsbreak -- especially JTom's comments about how Bush's incompetence in not initially securing ammo dumps in Iraq simply resulted in these insurgents having more explosives than they'll ever need and they are probably using these explosives to kill Americans right now. Malloy commented that it is the corporate media's job to help us forget about stuff like that, even though these failures by the Bush Regime are directly responsible for the quagmire we are in now.

Something funny happened a couple of calls after JTom's. A caller named Doug was attempting to make a comment connecting how Bush is "screwing" the country with Bush's threat to "pull out" of Iraq, but Malloy's censor would not let this caller finish. I just think it is interesting how jumpy everyone is after the Super Bowl nipple flash. But it is apparently OK for Laura Bush to tell a joke about horse masturbation on a C-Span broadcast, so I think Malloy's censor should have let Doug finish his joke.

Last Night's Poker Breakthrough

I did something last night that I have never done before. I played in a hold 'em tournament at my house and I didn't lose money. Sure, I didn't win any money either, but I finished high enough to get back my buy-in. Usually I'm the first one out of these things because I don't have to drive anywhere when it is over, meaning I tend to drink more and thus make bad decisions. But last night I learned that it is possible to have a few drinks and still play well enough to finish in the money. The key is to take a little bit more time thinking about what to do. Getting a few monster hands doesn't hurt either. My friend Phil from Vancouver finished first and my poker nemesis Liz finished second. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to get revenge against Frederick for taking me out of the tourney two weeks ago, because Frederick played at a different table and was out of the tournament before we consolidated into one table. Maybe next time.

And Speaking of Fascism . . .

Linda and I just finished watching Downfall on DVD. I believe it was the first post-war German film about Hitler, and it was very good. Bruno Ganz was excellent as Adolf Hilter. One scene reminded both Linda and me of Karl Rove and how he does things. I used to have a problem comprehending how a country like Nazi Germany could come into existence in the first place, but my last five years as an American citizen have given me a better understanding of the process involved, and watching Downfall added somewhat to that understanding. It is definitely worth checking out.

NYPost Turns on Bush

This is interesting -- even the right-winged New York Post thinks that Bush should go to Ohio and maybe attend a funeral or two for the Marines that he sent to their deaths on a lie. But Bush is a coward -- he won't even make public appearances anymore unless the crowd consists entirely of Bush supporters -- so I doubt he'd have the nerve to go to Ohio and possibly face some angry family members who might have a few questions for him.

Friday, August 05, 2005

Novak Meltdown

I must say that I am enjoying the Novak meltdown. First, he storms off (well, strolls off) the CNN set after uttering an expletive with very little if any provocation, then this:

http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showa.html?article=58686

The whole deal on CNN yesterday I think was staged. The moderator claims he was going to ask Novak about the TraitorGate scandal just before Novak walked off, and this does appear to be the case given that the "Who's Who" book -- one of Novak's possible sources for Plame's maiden name -- was reportedly sitting on the desk when Novak walked away . Perhaps CNN did all this to make it look tough (i.e., "we were finally going to ask Novak a hard-hitting question about the Plame matter before he walked off the set."). I've long thought that it was outrageous that Novak is still on CNN, given his direct involvement in outing a CIA operative. Hopefully we are seeing the beginning of the end of his career.

But it does appear that Novak is melting down, and I hope it is because he's getting a lot of pressure from Fitzgerald and his team on the Plame TreasonGate scandal.

Thursday, August 04, 2005

Harold's Blog

Welcome to my blog. As soon as I figure this thing out, I'm going to post stuff about fishing, politics, and poker.