Thursday, September 28, 2006

Olbermann Attacked By Terrorists (With Update)

Well, that's what yesterday's New York Post headline should read, but it doesn't. The piece is titled "POWDER PUFF SPOOKS KEITH."

The New York Post, by the way, is owned by Rupert Murdoch, the same right-winged extremist asshole who owns FauxNews. Here's what The Post has to say about the incident:

MSNBC loudmouth Keith Olbermann flipped out when he opened his home mail yesterday. The acerbic host of "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" was terrified when he opened a suspicious-looking letter with a California postmark and a batch of white powder poured out. A note inside warned Olbermann, who's a frequent critic of President Bush's policies, that it was payback for some of his on-air shtick. The caustic commentator panicked and frantically called 911 at about 12:30 a.m., sources told The Post's Philip Messing. An NYPD HazMat unit rushed to Olbermann's pad on Central Park South, but preliminary tests indicated the substance was harmless soap powder. However, that wasn't enough to satisfy Olbermann, who insisted on a checkup. He asked to be taken to St. Luke's Hospital, where doctors looked him over and sent him home. Whether they gave him a lollipop on the way out isn't known. Olbermann had no comment.
So what's the deal? I understand that Rupert Murdoch probably doesn't like Olbermann very much, but is it now legal to send letters through the mail that contain supicious white powder? The above-quoted NY Post piece sure makes it sound like it's no big deal.

And by the way, did BushCo ever figure out who was responsible for the anthrax attacks of 2001? Just asking.

UPDATE: Olbermann responds to Murdoch, and it looks like the New York Post probably impeded an FBI investigation by "reporting" on this story as it did:

[T]he New York Post never called NBC News or MSNBC seeking any comment. They would have been told that the FBI had requested we try to keep this quiet.

But of course that would have interfered with the New York Post making fun of a terror threat.

It's almost melodramatic to ask why the New York Post would choose the side of domestic terrorism, rather than choose the side of the FBI.

It's interesting too that Murdoch's paper was able to get a jump on this story so quickly -- nearly as quickly, as if they'd known it was coming.

Lastly, it's remarkable that this was actually printed by any newspaper, even in the current political climate, even in the wake of my editorial stance here, even with Rupert Murdoch's international reputation.

A month ago when reporter Steve Centanni of Murdoch's Fox News was kidnapped in Gaza -- along with his camera-man -- that network reached out to the others, this one included.

They relayed that the authorities there had urged everyone to keep reporting of the kidnapping low-key, and to a minimum, because it was believed the kidnappers did not know they had gotten hold of some one 'recognizable.'

We -- and every other major news organization -- immediately and thoroughly cooperated with Murdoch's request.

Now, in a return case, Murdoch's newspaper did not even make the single phone call that could've told it the potential damage it was doing.

So, next time a Fox or a New York Post employee is in distress -- or the government is investigating something endangering them -- and Murdoch's people ask us to hold a story?

Of course we will do so.

On this end, we're still human beings.

And Americans.

And we'd never have any problem choosing whether to support the terrorist, or the FBI.
Read the rest of Olbermann's response. It's pretty good. This whole incident should make for a great segment on his Countdown show.

No comments: