[I]n an unusual case in which an Arizona recipient of an RIAA letter has fought back in court rather than write a check to avoid hefty legal fees, the industry is taking its argument against music sharing one step further: In legal documents in its federal case against Jeffrey Howell, a Scottsdale, Ariz., man who kept a collection of about 2,000 music recordings on his personal computer, the industry maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer.Bullshit.
The industry's lawyer in the case, Ira Schwartz, argues in a brief filed earlier this month that the MP3 files Howell made on his computer from legally bought CDs are "unauthorized copies" of copyrighted recordings.
"I couldn't believe it when I read that," says Ray Beckerman, a New York lawyer who represents six clients who have been sued by the RIAA. "The basic principle in the law is that you have to distribute actual physical copies to be guilty of violating copyright. But recently, the industry has been going around saying that even a personal copy on your computer is a violation."
RIAA's hard-line position seems clear. Its Web site says: "If you make unauthorized copies of copyrighted music recordings, you're stealing. You're breaking the law and you could be held legally liable for thousands of dollars in damages."
Links
- Steve Benen
- Daily Kos
- Talking Points Memo
- Political Wire
- The Plum Line
- Huffington Post
- Slate
- Kevin Drum
- Salon
- Empty Wheel
- Axios
- Ed Kilgore
- Washington Monthly
- First Read
- PoliticusUSA
- Right Wing Watch
- The Onion
- The Rude Pundit
- Eschaton
- The Raw Story
- Think Progress
- Hullabaloo
- Media Matters
- Democratic Underground
- Crooks and Liars
- Blazer's Edge
- ESPN
Monday, December 31, 2007
A Suit Too Far
This is ridiculous:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment